Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011- 00800
Original file (BC-2011- 00800.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 
 
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00800 
IN THE MATTER OF: 
 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
   
 
HEARING DESIRED:  NOT INDICATED 
   
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
His  Reentry  (RE)  code  of  4C  (Separated  for  concealment  of 
juvenile  records,  minority,  failure  to  meet  physical  standards 
for  enlistment,  failure  to  attain  a  9.0  reading  grade  level  as 
measured  by  the  Air  Force  Reading  Abilities  Test,  or  void 
enlistments) be changed. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
He was discharged under false pretenses and with his current RE 
code, he cannot reenlist unless he has the code changed.  He was 
discharged  because  his  HIV  test  came  back  as  a  false  positive.  
When he took the blood test again it came back negative but by 
that time he had been discharged.  He would like to get back in 
because  he  feels  that  he  could  have  a  long  career  in  the  Air 
Force. 
 
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a copy of his 
DD Form  214,  Certificate  of  Release  or  Discharge  from  Active 
Duty,  issued  in  conjunction  with  his  23  Jun  10  discharge  and 
other supporting documents. 
 
The  applicant’s  complete  submission,  with  attachments,  is  at 
Exhibit A. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The  applicant  enlisted  in  the  Regular  Air  Force,  on  1  Jun  10, 
for a period of six years.  He was involuntarily discharged, on 
23  Jun  10,  for  Failed  Medical/Physical  Procurement  Standards 
with  uncharacterized  service.    He  was  credited  with  23  days  of 
active duty service. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 
AETC/SGPS  defers  to  the  Board  on  the  applicant’s  request  to 
change his RE code of 4C.   
 
Based on a review of the records provided, the applicant entered 
the  service  on  1  Jun  10  and  was  separated  23  Jun  10.    He  was 
seen at the Reid Clinic, on 15 Jun 10, for follow-up concerning 
a  positive  test  result  that  disqualified  him  from  continued 
military  service.    Because  of  the  positive  results,  he  was 
processed  for  an  entry  level  separation.    On  22  Jun  10,  the 
repeat  testing  was  returned  showing  a  negative  result,  but 
according  to  the  applicant  it  was  too  late  to  stop  the 
separation processing, and he was separated on 23 Jun 10.   
 
The complete AETC/SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C. 
 
AFPC/DPSOA recommends changing the applicant’s RE code to 2C, -
"Involuntarily  separated  with  an  honorable  discharge;  or  entry 
level  separation  without  characterization  of  service.", This is 
the  correct  code  required  by  AFI  36-2606,  Reenlistments  in  the 
USAF,  Chapter 3,  based  on  his  entry  level  separation  with 
uncharacterized  service.    The  RE  code  2C  applies  to  all  entry 
level separations without characterization of service regardless 
of  whether  the  discharge  is  voluntary  or  involuntary  and  RE 
codes in the 2# series has priority over all other RE codes.   
 
The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
Copies  of  the  Air  Force  evaluations  were  forwarded  to  the 
applicant on 1 Jul 11 for review and comment within 30 days.  As 
of  this  date,  no  response  has  been  received  by  this  office 
(Exhibit E). 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The  applicant  has  exhausted  all  remedies  provided  by 
existing law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was timely filed. 
 
3.  Sufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  error  or  injustice  warranting 
corrective  action.    We  took  notice  of  the  applicant’s  complete 
submission,  in  judging  the  merits  of  the  case.    We  note  the 
recommendation  of  AFPC/DPSOA  to  change  the  applicant’s  reentry 
code to “2C;” however, based on the review by AETC/SGPS, we note 
a  repeat  test  was  completed  reflecting  a  negative  result 
although  it  appears  the  applicant  had  already  separated.    As 

 
 

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 

such,  in  the  interest  of  justice  and  based  on  the  totality  of 
the  circumstances  surrounding  the  applicant’s  case,  we  believe 
the more appropriate reentry code would be “3K,”   which can be 
waived  to  allow  reenlistment  provided  he  meets  all  other 
requirements  for  enlistment  under  an  existing  prior  service 
program.  Whether he is successful or will depend on the needs 
of  the  service  concerned  and  our  recommendation  in  no  way 
guarantees  he  will  be  successful  in  returning  to  any  branch  of 
the  service.    Therefore,  we  recommend  his  records  be  corrected 
as indicated below. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 
 
The  pertinent  military  records  of  the  Department  of  the  Air 
Force  relating  to  APPLICANT,  be  corrected  to  show  that  on 
23 June 2010, he was discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-
3208,  (Secretarial  Authority),  with  a  Separation  (SPD)  code  of 
“KFF,” and his reentry code was “3K.” 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number  BC-2011-00800  in  Executive  Session  on  25  October  2011, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
All  members  voted  to  correct  the  records,  as  recommended.    The 
following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 14 Feb 11, w/atchs. 
     Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 
     Exhibit C.  Letter, AETC/SGPS, dated 25 Apr 11. 
     Exhibit D.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 13 Jun 11. 
     Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Jul 11. 
 
 
 
 
                                   Panel Chair 

 
 

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03706

    Original file (BC-2011-03706.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He is willing to submit to any Air Force medical procedure to prove that he was misdiagnosed with VCD. The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04534

    Original file (BC-2010-04534.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04534 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 4C (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02296

    Original file (BC-2011-02296.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02296 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry code (RE) 4C (concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or void entry level separation without...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00406

    Original file (BC-2011-00406.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 29 Jan 10, the applicant was notified by his commander that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for erroneous enlistment. Although both AFPC/DPSOA and DPSOS recommend denial of relief DPSOA does note the applicant’s RE code is in error, and should be 2C; however, based on the review and recommendation provided by AETC/SGPS we believe his RE code should be changed to 3K, which would afford him the opportunity to apply for enlistment in the armed services. We note that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02366

    Original file (BC 2013 02366.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His correct RE code is 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) as required by AFI 36-2606, Reenlistments in the USAF, based on his entry level separation without characterization of service. DPSOA has confirmed that the “4C” RE code currently listed on the applicant’s DD Form 214 is erroneous and that it will administratively correct the applicant’s DD Form 214 to reflect “2C.” However, it is noted that SGPS...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04753

    Original file (BC-2010-04753.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 6 May 2011, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E). However, a recent medical evaluation submitted by the applicant indicates she does not present symptoms or reaction to bananas. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01078

    Original file (BC-2010-01078.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01078 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of “2C” (involuntarily separated with a honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a “4C” RE Code (separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03614

    Original file (BC-2011-03614.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03614 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 4C (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01550

    Original file (BC-2012-01550.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete AETC/SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial of the applicant’s request to upgrade his RE code to a code that would allow him to reenter military service. The applicant’s DD Form 214 will be administratively corrected to reflect the correct RE code 2C unless otherwise directed by the Board. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01015

    Original file (BC 2014 01015.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The medical authorities concluded that the applicant had a pre-existing condition that would have precluded him from joining the Air Force had this condition been made known at the time of his enlistment. We note that AFPC/DPSOA has determined the applicant’s reentry (RE) code of 4C was issued erroneously and has corrected his records administratively to reflect that he was issued an RE code of 2C; however, in view of the fact that it appears as though the applicant’s disqualifying...